A Imprisonment of one year, Defendant B, and Defendant G are punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E.

1. Defendants A’ status and criminal records are the operator of the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Q Lifelong Education Institute, Defendant B, and Defendant C’s employees of the Q Lifelong Education Institute, Defendant D is the operator of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Rative Care Center, Defendant E is the operator of the Bupyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Rative Care Center, Defendant E is the operator of Bupyeong-gu Seoul Bupyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Telecommunications Secretariat, Defendant F is the head of Seocheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Telecommunications Secretariat, Defendant G’s social workers’ V branch social workers, and the head of the employment center for the senior citizens

Defendant

On April 27, 2012, F was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution on September 22, 2012 by fraud, etc. in the vice branch of the Incheon District Court, and the judgment was finalized on September 22, 2012.

2. The Defendants’ obstruction of performance of official duties and obstruction of duties by fraudulent means, in order to obtain the 2nd class social welfare worker qualification certificate, should complete the social welfare-related subjects (at least 10 subjects and 4 subjects of choice) established at each university, and they are well aware that the Defendants’ performance of duties should undergo field training for at least a total of 120 hours under the instruction of the 120-hour social welfare worker qualification certificate by a corporation, facility, institution, or organization related to social welfare business (the so-called “marba” and the 1st social welfare worker qualification certificate holder for at least three years, who has been with the 2nd social welfare worker qualification certificate for at least five years).

Defendant

A, B, and C paid money to Defendant E, D, G, H, and F in lieu of conducting on-the-job training. Defendant E, etc. issued a certificate of on-the-job training even if they did not receive on-the-job training from those who were introduced by A, etc., in return for the money and did not receive on-the-job training, the Defendants made a false certificate of on-the-job training necessary for acquiring social workers and decided to enable them to obtain social workers' qualification by using a false on-the-job training certificate.

Defendant

A. A.