If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

At around 16:00 on December 10, 2017, the Defendant heard talks about the victim C (the age of 47)’s house in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, that the victim was not influencing, and it was difficult for the victim E (the age of 57) to avoid disturbance with the victim’s “influencing the victim’s house” by finding the victim’s house in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, and sound the victim’s house, and then, the victim’s E (the age of 57) was flucing the Defendant’s face at his/her horse’s hand twice, with the victim’s hair’s fluencing hand, so that his/her head may face with the wall, and the victim’s hair and flucing part may be flucing, and the victim’s face may be flucing with the victim’s hair’s hair and fluor, and the victim’s face may be 15 years old,5 years old,5 (the victim’s face).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C, E, and F;

1. Criminal tools and photographs of damage;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of special violence), Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of special intimidation) of the Criminal Act, the selection of each fine for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserts that the part of the assault and special assault is not recognized, but the victims have stated the victims in detail and consistent with the investigation agency up to this court, and thus, they can be sufficiently convicted of the facts charged.