If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives a vehicle BM5 vehicle in the course of business.

On November 28, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 17:53 on November 28, 2012, and changed the course to a two-lane course while driving at about 10 km from the right side of Pyeongtaek-si to the right side of the new Tri-dong.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving service shall not drive at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and obstacle on others, and shall not change course when it is likely to impede normal traffic of other vehicles when changing the vehicle. There was a duty of care to change the vehicle by operating direction direction, etc. in order to give notice of change of course and to make it possible to change the vehicle line in the manner of giving notice of change of course in front and rear direction, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the damage to the right-hand part of the vehicle operated by the Defendant by changing the vehicle line into two lanes as it is, and caused the damage to the victim C (Nam, 42 years old)'s left-hand part of the driver's vehicle volume, which was driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence during approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time damaged the victim’s property in such a way that the sum of repair costs, such as subsequent fluor and subsequent fluoring exchange of damaged vehicles, etc. exceeds KRW 979,160.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The actual survey report and the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment order is issued for the reasons above Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.