around 23:00 on July 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) taken a C-cab driven by the victim B from the spam of the modern department store located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-do, to a without-passing-dong, a destination; and (b) the victim tolded that “I am spons from the opposite opposite part because I am spacker, I am am spick.”

Accordingly, when the victim was unable to drive his taxi while he was forced to drive, the defendant left the taxi of the victim for about one hour, instead of getting off from the taxi of the victim for about 00 00,00 on July 18, 2015, the defendant got off the taxi of the victim for about one hour.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (in cases of the inducement in a workhouse, 100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that there is no particular criminal history against the defendant; the crime of this case requires the victim to refuse to take passengers, and the circumstances leading up to the occurrence of the victim’s refusal