When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall allow any person to repeatedly reach another person in the form of code, language, sound, image, or picture that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network.

Nevertheless, on August 5, 2013, the Defendant received the progress payment for stonework using his mobile phone at an unclaimed place on August 14:3, 2013, and without paying wages to on-site workers D, and thereby, “the phone (E) used by the potential victim D,” is not sufficient. Family members are dismissed. Family members are the body of birth.. It is early and prompt contact with the birth rejection of the awareness of school... It is called “Semanghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and D;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. The content of the message;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on screen by cutting text messages;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. concerning the relevant criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act that there is no criminal record identical to the defendant, circumstances in which the defendant sent text messages, relationship between the defendant and the victim, etc.