Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against intimidation is dismissed.

On September 2, 2017, at around 21:00, the Defendant stolen the Defendant’s land 2, a site of approximately KRW 6,000, the market price of the victim, located in the above office, within the office operated by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C, the building B No. 805, Nam-gu, Incheon.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the accused (including a cross-examination);

1. The first statement made to C by the police;

1. The suspect Gap voluntarily submitted the investigation report (b) suspicion of paragraph (1) [the defendant asserted that he/she was holding a paper No. 804, E, E, the office of the defendant, with the permission of E, but only argued that he/she returned the paper No. 804, which is owned by E, but not mentioning that he/she was owned by E in the investigation process, and that he/she was not owned by E, and that there is no motive to remove things owned by E.

The victim's assertion that he/she takes a paper A4 is more persuasive.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Part dismissing the public prosecution under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (including the minor damage, the victim does not want the punishment, and the primary crime) of the suspended sentence

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On September 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) in an influent area below Incheon; (b) on the ground that the Defendant did not pay the victim’s benefits and retirement benefits without paying it; and (c) using a mobile phone, the Defendant would be able to kill the representative by using the mobile phone.

“Delivery of the text message”

In other words, the victim was threatened.

B. From around October 2, 2017, the Defendant used a mobile phone for the foregoing reasons to the victim’s “the representative male fluence who left the representative male fluence and so on shall be the fluence that the representative male fluence could not be in arrears of wages,” and the head of the household shall be 19 million won if the representative had not been in arrears of wages.