When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

In collusion with C, the Defendant and B conspired with C to borrow money from the victim E by forging the lease contract with the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 3rd floor as collateral by forging the lease contract, the Defendant and C forged the lease contract, and the Defendant decided to engage in Fition, the lessor of the above loan, and the Defendant was willing to borrow and borrow money while exercising the forged lease contract with the victim E.

1. In collusion with C on August 2012, the Defendant and C made it impossible to find out the trade name located in the Northwestern of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul around the end of August, 2012, the Defendant and C entered “Seoul Seodaemun-gu D (3 floors),” “l million won (70,000,000)” in the deposit column, and “one million won (10,000,000)” in the remainder column, the remainder column as “F (60,000,000)”, and the remainder column as “from November 30, 201 to November 30, 2013,” and the lessor’s name in the column, “F,” the lessor’s name in the column, “resident registration number,” and “H” column as “after preparing for the remainder column.” < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23284, Nov. 25, 2011>

Accordingly, the Defendant and B forged a set-off contract in the name of F, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising them in collusion with C.

2. Around 11:00 on August 30, 2012, the Defendant and B engaged in the uttering of the above investigation document in collusion with C, and at E’s house located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, B used the forged lease contract as if it had been duly formed by borrowing money from E who knew of the forgery.

3. The Defendant and B in collusion with C, at the time and place set forth in the foregoing paragraph 2, and B, as seen above, presented to the victim E as if they were the genuine lease contract with the deposit amount of KRW 70 million which was completed, the amount of KRW 20 million out of the claim for the return of the deposit amount of KRW 70 million against F would be transferred to the victim.