When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 22, 2014, the Defendant, as the Director of the Management Office of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Village, had controversy over the qualifications of the above apartment management candidate E among the representative election candidates, and failed to dismiss the examination of the candidate of the E's representative election candidate on January 22, 2014, by holding at will a meeting on January 23, 2014 and holding a resolution to revoke the examination of E's decision, and holding a public notice in the name of the Chairperson of the above Management Office of the Election Management.

1. On January 23, 2014, the Defendant forged private document: (a) prepared a “a statement of the registration of the same representative candidate and the additional public notice of the scheduled election for the representative candidate E” with the content that the decision on the examination of the candidate for the representative candidate E was revoked using a computer network program within the above C Apartment Management Office; (b) stated the suspension part of the above public notice as the “chairperson of the C Apartment Election Management Commission”; (c) affixed the official seal of the chairman of the Election Management Commission who was kept in custody next thereto; and (d) made a copy of 10 copies using a reproduction machine.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant forged 11 copies of "a letter of registration of candidates for the same representative and a notice of scheduled election" under the name of the chairman of the election management committee, which is a private document of certification of facts.

2. On January 24, 2014, the Defendant posted 11 copies of the forged C Apartment 149-dong Elevators and 148-dong bulletin boards, etc. as above, as if they were duly formed, “the addition of the registration of candidates for the same representative and the notice of scheduled election” to the residents who may know of the fact.

3. As above, the Defendant interfered with the election management of the chairman of the election management commission by forging and using 11 copies of “a registration of the same representative candidate and a notice of scheduled election” under the name of the chairman of the election management commission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of the witnesses D, F, G, H, and I.