If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On July 23, 2015, around 08:07, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the said vehicle by walking the Franchise vehicle owned by the victim E, which was parked at the same time without any justifiable reason, in the light of the lower part of the Franchis vehicle owned by the victim E, and walking the front part of the Franchise vehicle, and the rear part of the lower part of the vehicle, with the repair cost of KRW 1,00,000.

2. In the date and time set forth in Paragraph 1, the injured Defendant: (a) 3-4 walked the victim E (the 52-year-old age)’s scam to avoid the above act of the Defendant at a place; and (b) 15-day damage to the victim’s left hand hand hand, which requires the victim’s treatment for about 15 days, was caused by the flash.

3. The Defendant: (a) took a bath to the Defendant, who was called out after receiving a report of 112 at the time and place of the performance of official duties; (b) taken the Defendant’s h’s scambling with the Defendant, who was scambling to “Ye, Yewhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn the Defendant’s left part, and attempted to take the Defendant’s h’s scamblhhhhhh

While the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties and was carrying out patrol vehicles, he spited on the left part of H, spited on the spit, and spited on the right hand of H with the hand saw, and spited on the blick, and walked the H’s spit on one occasion from the patrol vehicle, and spited on one time from the patrol vehicle, and spited on one time from the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of H and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of statutes on the photograph of the case

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment (the point of causing property damage and the choice of fines);