However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On March 5, 2020, at around 22:17, around 22:17, the Defendants came to run in front of the E healthcare room operated by the victim D with the victims of the C4th floor in Busan Metropolitan City, and, at that time, the Defendants loaded three unsatisfes II trucks containing three unsatisfes on the market price, such as the piracy presses in which the victims own the victims.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each written statement of the Defendants’ written statements of their respective legal statements and the application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants subject to suspended sentence: (a) considering that the crimes of this case committed by the Defendants in combination with each other were stolen the victim’s property, and the liability for such crimes was grave; (b) the Defendants have a number of criminal records; (c) Defendant B had been punished for the same kind of crime; and (d) the Defendants did not take any specific measures to recover from damage up to now, the Defendants were led to the confession of the crime; (d) the process of collecting goods; and (e) there are some circumstances to be taken into account; and (e) the same criminal records of Defendant B have long been long before the sentence; and (e) comprehensively taking into account all other circumstances, such as the Defendants’ age, occupation, background leading to the crime, scale of damage, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence identical to the order shall be imposed on the Defendants.