All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The punishment sentenced by the court below (17 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination on the assertion of unfair sentencing by the Defendant and the prosecutor was found to have a strong attachment with the victim D because the victim D, who was a son, was living alone and living alone from the time when he became an adult, was scambling, and distributed a leaflet where his whereabouts were found to be unknown, and thus, the victim D was scambling and requested to kill the victim. The Defendant continued refusal from the victim D, and was scambling with the victim D while scam and scambling with the victim D while scambling scam with their head, and tried to kill the victim D from the heart where scam scambling status and life were abandoned, and the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case and the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case are acknowledged to have been taken into account, such as the circumstances leading up to the occurrence of the crime of this case and the circumstances after the crime of this case.

However, as the Defendant had a knife with a knife who had a knife with a knife without one-way appraisal, he had a knifeer's chest, a knife, and so on several times, and caused the Victim K to die with a heart, caused a serious injury to the victim D, and did not take any measures to recover the victims' damage.

In light of the above circumstances and other factors, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the instant crime, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.

Defendant

The prosecutor's assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. Conclusion: Defendant and Prosecutor.