beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.06 2017고단7964

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 23, 2017, the Defendant explained about the method of sexual traffic, service, etc. to a police officer who pretended to customers at the C marina area operated by the Defendant on March 23, 2017 at Osan-si B B B, Osan-si, and received a cash of KRW 100,000 in the cost of sexual traffic, and then sent information to the police officer to guide the above police officer, and bring D, an employee of the above business place, into the same room to have him/her sexual intercourse with the police officer.

In the business of arranging sexual traffic, this act was conducted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The criminal place;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from telephone calls of a crackdown police officer and report);

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the background and result of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable circumstances: The circumstances in which there is no record of punishment imposed by a fine exceeding the fine: Whether the defendant is willing to engage in sexual traffic from the police officer who is most likely to be a customer;

"Absently, the expression " merely made it difficult to understand that he or she would be a fluority and fluor in return for questioning, and that he or she actually did not violate any mistake, such as denying the crime, etc., by asserting that he or she has no intention to arrange sexual traffic.