손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 26,548,00 for the Plaintiff and the following: 5% per annum from March 10, 2016 to April 13, 2017.
1. According to the reasoning of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 7 (including branch numbers), and the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 4-1, 2, and 3 as a whole, the plaintiff planted approximately 900 mp trees, such as 1,464 mp trees and fop-up trees, in official city, for a landscape gardening business. The defendant, around 15:00 on March 10, 2016, around D, was the winding day, and around the above argument, there was a possibility of spreading due to a storming. At the same time, the defendant laid off a newspaper as a mop-up land to take safety measures, such as spop-uping water or working with more than two people to board a grass, and the plaintiff's 1,464 mop-up tree and the plaintiff's 5 mop-up tree and the plaintiff's spop-up tree (hereinafter "the plaintiff's 50 mop-up.").
According to the above facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the above fire, since the fire occurred due to negligence that the defendant did not take safety measures to prevent the fire, and the plaintiff was damaged by such negligence.
2. According to the overall purport of the arguments and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 6 and 8 (including branch numbers), the minimum landscaped trees of the Public Procurement Service may be acknowledged as requiring KRW 34,100 per flusss, in the case of flusing trees, KRW 48,740 per flus, in the case of flusing trees, and KRW 48,740 per fluss, in the case of flusing trees, damaged trees due to the instant accident, removed the trees damaged by the instant accident, and KRW 910,00,000, in the case of new trees, KRW 7,000, in the case of planting trees.
Therefore, the amount of damages that the Defendant is liable to compensate to the Plaintiff is KRW 26,548,00 [The amount of damages that the Defendant is liable to compensate to the Plaintiff is KRW 26,548,00 [the amount of damages x 34,100 x 450 x 48,740 x 48,740 x 400 ＋ 2,000]
3. The defendant's conclusion shall be the plaintiff.