However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 23, 2016, from around 17:30 to 18:00 the same day, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) expressed the Defendant a large voice with the Defendant’s “I will bring about a fluorous frich;” and (c) expressed the Defendant’s “I will bring about a fluorous fluorction,” i.e., a fluor of the Defendant’s fluorcing fluor of alcohol,” i.e., “I will bring about a fluorc fluor of the fluorc fluorc fluor of the fluorc fluorc fluor of the fluorc bit.”

“A noise,” such as taking a bath with a large sound, is difficult to avoid any disturbance.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

2. Around 18:00 on November 23, 2016, the Defendant publicly insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim by stating that “The victim F, a police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station E District, dispatched by the Defendant after receiving a report to the effect that the Defendant f, who was a police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station Evise, will return home to the Defendant,” on the ground that the victim F, who was a police officer belonging to the said restaurant, the said restaurant, employees, and the imprisone, should return home to the Defendant.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. C’s statement;

1. An investigation report (Evidence No. 1), an investigation report (in the event of a crime, a CD verification report);

1. Application of the CDA-1 statute

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following factors shall be considered in favor of the defendant among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria;

A. Crimes (Interference with Duties) for which the sentencing criteria are set (the scope of punishment on recommendation) (the scope of punishment on recommendation) are set (Interference with Duties). The mitigation area (one month to August) is the mitigated area.