However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. A special intimidation: (a) around August 7, 2017, the Defendant threatened the Defendant with the following reasons: (b) on the ground that the victim C (here, 48 years of age) who was the wife at the Defendant’s plant located in B of the libera-do, Maldong-do, and gave a verbal reply to the Defendant; (c) on the part of the victim, the Defendant entered the Defendant’s workplace with the dangerous object located at the entrance of the workplace, and brought the improvement to the part above the part of the victim. (d) After dancing, the Defendant “I see that the victim would have come to the end of the libera-do, and that I would not properly listen to the light.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. The injured Defendant threatened the victim as described in paragraph 1 at the date, time, and at the place described in paragraph 1, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as ear and spathy, spathy, and spathy which need to be treated for about two weeks by hand, and spathy, spathing the victim’s face, and having no open spathy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on investigation (on-site photographs, etc.), photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283(1), and 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is committed with respect to the crime of this case, which is a dangerous object, and thus requires strict punishment since it is highly dangerous. The Defendant’s assertion of suffering from the Defendant during the crime is disadvantageous.

There are no criminal records of the defendant, and there are no criminal records of the defendant except several times of a fine related to traffic.