병역법위반등
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and for not more than four months for a crime of No. 2 as decided by the court below.
except that this shall not apply.
Punishment of the crime
[2016 Highest 2858] On August 19, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of embezzlement and the violation of the Military Service Act in the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of the Suwon branch of the Suwon branch of the Suwon branch of the Republic of Korea, and completed the execution of the sentence on October 3, 2015.
1. The Defendant in violation of the Military Service Act is a social service worker working in the Gwangju Viewing C division.
Social service personnel shall not leave their service or serve in the relevant field for a period of eight days or more in total without justifiable grounds.
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not work at the above workplace without justifiable grounds from December 14, 2015 to December 30, 2015, and was absent from service for at least eight days in total.
[2016 High Order 4652] On August 27, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution as a result of the violation of the Military Service Act from the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch, and the judgment was finalized on September 4, 2010. On August 19, 2015, the judgment became final and conclusive on August 27, 2015 upon being sentenced to two months of imprisonment for embezzlement by the same court.
2. False entry, such as electronic records, shall be a vehicle that can normally register ownership when the defendant has closed his/her car trading company after having made a transfer registration under the name of the automobile trading company after having made a transfer registration of ownership from a person who has engaged in a motor vehicle trading business without his/her name;
Recognizing the explanation of “the”, it purchased large-sized vehicles and resells them to the individual buyers, with the intention of having the ownership transfer registration for large-sized vehicles in the name of the so-called vehicle trading company that exists only in the document form.
On August 18, 2010, the Defendant operated the foregoing company, a prospective company, through a trading company in a name-free manner, even though it was not F ownership because the Defendant sold E B-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S
G shall request G to apply for the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the above company, and G shall not be able to identify the name according to the above request.