If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who drives Category B vehicle as his duties.

On November 14, 2018, at around 12:26, the Defendant tried to proceed with a road in front of the D cafeteria, located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, in excess of a yellow solid line running toward the front parking lot of the E E-building adjacent to the road, from the edge of the D cafeteria to the center of the road.

In such cases, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by taking into account whether there are other vehicles, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and tried to proceed beyond the yellow domin line to the rear of the G-si vehicle driven by the Victim F (F, who is 67 years of age) who was standing in the Central Market distance on the side of the middle bridge. However, the Defendant left the said taxi without taking necessary measures after an accident and destroying the said taxi to the end of the mast vehicle, which is the damaged vehicle, by taking the front part of the mast vehicle, and destroying the said taxi to the extent of 540,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A report on the actual situation of occurrence, a report on the situation of occurrence, an accident camera, an accident site photograph, an accident site photograph, a vehicle photograph, a car-book (B), a black stuff image (B), and a report on internal investigation;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the Defendant’s failure to perform his/her duty of care while driving, thereby damaging damaged vehicles so that the amount equivalent to 5,400,000 won of the repair cost would be less and the error of the instant crime leaving the scene would not be less narrowly. Therefore, the conditions for sentencing favorable to the Defendant, such as that the economic situation is not good, may also be considered.