When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. Defendant B (Defendant B) is a person who runs the lodging business with the trade name “Felel” from February 3, 2009 to Kimhae-si.

On November 17, 2011, the Defendant screened obscene materials to an unspecified number of customers, and filed an administrative appeal with the Gyeong-do Administrative Appeals Commission for the suspension of business from Kimhae-si, which was subject to an administrative disposition of two months of business suspension, and received an administrative disposition of one month of business suspension on April 10, 201 from Kimhae-si, which was subject to an administrative disposition of one month of business suspension on April 10, 201. However, on April 26, 2012 during the said period of business suspension, the Defendant was subject to an administrative disposition of the order of business closure on May 25, 2012 from Kim Jong-si, which was under the said period of business suspension.

Accordingly, on June 20, 2012, the Defendant filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of a disposition to close down the place of business with the Changwon District Court, and filed an application for a witness for the said telecom employee A to the effect that he/she did not operate his/her business within the business suspension period, thereby leading the said lawsuit favorable to the Defendant.

On September 2012, the Defendant asked for testimony to the effect that the Defendant had been employed by employees and long-term guests and did not have any general customers, and the fact that the Defendant had been engaged in the telecoming business during the period of business suspension, and that the guest room used in the telecoming at the time of the police enforcement was a guest room used by the guest room. However, the Defendant asked for testimony to the effect that he had not been engaged in the telecoming business during the period of business suspension, and that the guest room used at the time of the police enforcement was the guest room used by the employee and long-term guests.

Therefore, at around 14:00 on November 15, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the following paragraph (2) was included in the Changwon District Court 211 located in Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant instigated A with perjury.

2. The Defendant, at around 14:00 on November 15, 2012, the Changwon District Court No. 211, which was located in Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si.