However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:25 on December 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that the Defendant interfered with traffic flow on the road prior to the “C” located in Sacheon-si B on the road; (b) and (c) asked the reporter, Inspector E of the D District affiliated with the D District Party, and the slopeF, to have the Defendant seated on the road, and asked him/her about his/her personal information; and (d) he/she puts his/her me to “whether he/she is aware of his/her name or internal name”; (c) puts his/her me on the face of E; (d) followed by E, he/she walked his/her right generated part of E, and left part of the left part and left part of E in his/her face each time, and her sloping F was removed, and committed assault, such as f’s spheringinginginging the sway.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the accused has led to the confession of the crime and that the accused has repented

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;