2. We can see favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant made a confession of facts constituting an offense, the fact that the amount of material damage is not so significant, and the fact that the piracy vehicle purchases a comprehensive automobile insurance policy.

On the other hand, the defendant, by his own negligence, exceeded the scene of the accident without taking any measures that cause physical damage, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good. According to the records, there is a strong doubt that the defendant was driving at the time. At the time, the defendant seems to have escaped from the two vehicles while driving a harmful vehicle in order to avoid detection of drinking alcohol, and the defendant was punished three times by a fine by drinking or unlicensed driving, and one year by a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor.

In addition, in full view of the facts that the court below determined the punishment against the defendant by taking into account all the circumstances, and there is no special change in the trial, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, environment, sexual conduct, motive for the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.