However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant interfered with the duties of the Defendant at a convenience store located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, from April 4, 2013 to April 22:25, 2013, and from 22:40 to 22:40, the Defendant was equal to the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit

The bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit, and the victim's convenience store operation duties were obstructed by force by preventing many unspecified customers from entering the convenience store by smoking tobacco, etc.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the above date, at the above place, and at the 112 report, and received a request for presentation of identification cards from the police officers E belonging to the police station of the Incheon Western Police Station D police station, the Defendant interfered with the police officers’ legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of reporting duties 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in writing C;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;