Seized evidence 1 or 16 shall be confiscated from the accused.

1. The person who was unaware of the name of fraud plays a role in making a false contact with many and unspecified persons without permission and remitting money to his/her designated account. The Defendant conspired to withdraw money transferred as above by cash using the check card and then re-transfer the remainder other than the Defendant’s share to the account designated by the person who was unable to receive the name. A.

On July 30, 2019, the victim B sent the message as if the victim was C and then sent the message to the victim as if the victim was C, and the victim had the victim wired KRW 5,830,00 to the E-bank account (F) in the name of D on the same day.

On July 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) sent the e-mail card connected to the above D’s account through a nameless box; and (b) possessed the e-mailed “detailed” work to verify whether the pertinent account is a normal transactionable account; (c) around July 30, 2019, the Defendant attempted to withdraw the money remitted to the victim using the e-mail card at the e-mail-dong branch of the Bank located in Geum-gu, Busan; but (d) failed to withdraw money from the wind that the said account had already been suspended.

B. On August 2, 2019, the victim H made an account of Kakao Kakao that acquired the victim H’s personal information and misrepresented the victim I by an infinite means, and then corrected the facts charged ex officio on the basis of the adopted evidence to the extent that it does not interfere with the victim’s wifeJ’s exercise of defense right at an infinite place.

The message should be sent to the enterprise as if it were I.