When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 21:30 on 02. 05. 21:2. 05. 21:30, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim, who was his wife in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, (b) d (her wife, (e.g., 52 years of age); (c) took a call to the victim, who thought the victim's disregarded himself; and (d) took a look at the victim, who was on the top of the end, with the victim's thought that he would die and die without any negligence; and (e) took the petroleum in the main store, and dump oil in the bottom of the main store.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous goods and threatened the victim with oil.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, D, G, H, and I;

1. Application of the seizure list and the Act and subordinate statutes governing site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act and Articles 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The crime of this case committed by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, regardless of his/her intention, is a dangerous act by itself. However, the victim is the defendant's wife, the victim desires, the defendant thought that he/she was neglected from the victim while under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant committed the crime of this case contingently, and the defendant did not seem to have actually done fire prevention by taking necessary measures, such as washing petroleum, etc., after which he/she was under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant's depth is against the defendant, etc. shall be determined by the above punishment.