대여금
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 28,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from May 1, 2013 to July 16, 2014; and (b) July 17, 2014.
In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, evidence Nos. 1 and 2, as a whole, the Plaintiff agreed to receive interest on the 15th day of each month when lending KRW 40,000,000 to the Defendant on January 10, 2013. The Plaintiff received reimbursement of KRW 4,000,000 from the Defendant on February 22, 2013, and KRW 4,000,000 on March 22, 2013, and KRW 12,00,000 on April 30, 2013, and KRW 12,00,000,000 from the date following the date of the entire pleadings. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of loans to the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 28,00,000 (=40,000,00-12,000 per annum from the date of the last repayment to the date of the Plaintiff’s repayment.
The defendant did not directly borrow money from the plaintiff, but introduced C to the plaintiff and borrowed C from the plaintiff, and the plaintiff could not respond to the plaintiff's claim because he had lost the defendant's honor by finding the defendant's cosmetics seller and causing a huge loss of property by hindering the defendant's business. However, the defendant's assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's above assertion.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.