A. The Plaintiff lent a total of KRW 290,000,000 to the Defendant as indicated in the following table, and the representative manager B, who is the Defendant’s representative, guaranteed each loan obligation.

An agreement on the loan of 12% per annum (1.56% per annum (1.0,000,000,000 business start-up business support funds) of 2.7% per annum (2.7% per annum from January 1, 2019 to 6%) of the interest rate on the loan of 10,000 interest rate on March 20, 2013 (290,000 per annum of 1.56% per annum (1.56% per annum from January 1, 2019) of the interest rate on the loan of 190,000 interest rate on the loan of 1.56% per annum (290,00,000,000

B. The Defendant did not pay the principal and interest of each of the above loan obligations and lost the benefit of time on March 4, 2016.

C. As of February 1, 2020, the interest accrued until January 31, 2020 is calculated. The loan principal of each of the above loan obligations is KRW 286,950,00, interest amounting to KRW 4,490,825, overdue interest amounting to KRW 116,310,317, and overdue interest amounting to KRW 17,702,544 recovered from the individual rehabilitation procedure against B, a joint guarantor of each of the above loan obligations, and the loan principal is KRW 269,247,456, if the Plaintiff partly appropriated the loan principal to repay part of the loan principal under the individual rehabilitation procedure against B, a joint guarantor of the above loan obligations.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, 2-2-1, 3-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the interest rate of KRW 390,048,598 (i.e., interest rate of KRW 269,247,456 at interest rate of KRW 4,490,825 at interest rate of KRW 116,310,317 at interest rate of KRW 416,317), and 273,738,281 at interest rate of KRW 273,738,281 (i.e., interest rate of KRW 269,247,456 at interest rate of KRW 4,490,825 at interest rate of KRW 269,247,456 at interest rate of the leased principal) from February 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020, the service date of the original copy of the payment order of this case, and damages for delay calculated by 12% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.