However, as to the Defendants, each of the above decisions is made for one year from the date of the conclusion of this judgment.

The Defendants are self-recovered.

The Defendants discovered various persons including victims E (the age of 76) in the vicinity of the D village in the Yasan-si, and moved to the above vehicle with part of the victims, when the victims and the other persons who get off from the above vehicle were in dispute with the victims of the Goguma in a dry field in a dry field where the dry field owner or the cultivator was harvested of the Goguma at a dry field where the owner of a dry field or the cultivator was cultivating the Goguma.

On September 16, 2018, the Defendants: (a) around 09:45 on September 16, 2018, the G Round located in F in the following city, and (b) even though the victim was moving back and driving away, Defendant A was on the driver’s seat of the car, Defendant B was on board the seat of the car, and Defendant B tried to start the vehicle after closing the lap of the lap.

Therefore, even though the victim opened a front door to prevent the departure of the victim, and gets a heavy sound from the vehicle towards the defendants, and the defendant B was faced with the victim by hand in order to close the chief door, and the defendant A proceeded with the victim in a state where the victim is being moored on the vehicle, and the defendant A got off the vehicle, thereby leading about about 20 meters away from the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use a passenger car, which is a dangerous object, to inflict an injury on the victim, such as a pressure to give approximately five weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One to ten years of imprisonment;

2. The sentencing criteria shall be based on; and