게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal against the Defendants is that each sentence of the lower court (for a period of two years of suspended execution, surveillance of protection, community service order 80 hours, confiscation, Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for six months, two years of suspended execution, surveillance of protection, community service order 80 hours, confiscation) is too uneased and unfair.
2. The crime related to illegal game centers need to be punished for a crime that has a great social harm, such as encouraging citizens to commit an excessive gambling spirit, and undermining sound labor practice.
However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendants reflect the Defendants’ mistake; (b) there was no previous conviction for the Defendants; and (c) Defendant A was the first offender; and (d) the period of the instant business was relatively short; and (c) other various sentencing conditions specified in the instant pleadings, such as the background of the instant crime; (b) the circumstances after the instant crime; and (c) the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, and environment, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit, since each of the lower judgment’s punishment against the Defendants is too una
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.