The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable in maintaining the conclusion of the first instance court that found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding perjury, or by violating the Defendant’s final right to make a statement, presumption of innocence, principle of evidence judgment, and strict principle of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.