Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found the defendant's false accusation against E is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts and in the misapprehension of legal principles.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to whether the E’s statement in the court of the case at issue at issue was false testimony contrary to his memory, it cannot be deemed that the E’s testimony was false. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion based on this premise is without merit.

A. E consistently from the police to the court of law, consistently asked the male who entered the Dotong with F along with F, and received the key to 30,000 won, thereby getting up to 2nd floor. At the time, F was later later and did not request the male in the Ka to verify the F's age or present his identification card.

“The statement was made”.

(b) E shall report “to this end,” the photo of the Moel entrance door and the second floor corridor photograph presented by the first investigation agency in specifying the DoMoel.

The statement "," and thereafter, the taxi waiting in front of the bus terminal at the Mosel, where the Mosel felblings the tobacco at the convenience store, there is a taxi waiting place in front of the bus terminal at the Mosel, and the f in the taxi waiting place was sent to the si and the f was on board the si at low-level.

Musan 17 years' volume was 17 years' Masan and C was frequently, gymna trade name, and signboards were known so that they could not be confused.

(2) Domination.