On May 3, 2013, the Defendant used the car registration number plate altered by operating the said vehicle from the dY offline 3.5km to the dY offline 15:18 DY to the DY, with a registration number plate of which the dX was changeded by DY in a dY-based method.

2. According to the records, the fact that the defendant is the actual owner of the vehicle stated in the facts charged is recognized.

However, in full view of all the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court, it is insufficient to recognize that the defendant operated a vehicle with the date and time indicated in the facts charged, the registration number plate attached thereto at the place, and that at the time the defendant was aware of such alteration, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a time when there is no proof of crime, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act to determine innocence against the defendant and to publish the summary of this decision in accordance with Article 58 (2) of the Criminal Act.