However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On November 21, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

On March 21, 2020, around 18:45, the Defendant driven a car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 80 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.163% from the road front of the convenience store in the north-gu, Mapo-si B to the front road of the same Gu D apartment.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind of suspect);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act [The choice of imprisonment and the degree of blood alcohol concentration shall be taken into account];

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (in addition to the grounds for discretionary mitigation, taking into account the fact that one fine due to drunk driving has been sentenced and there is no criminal record other than that of criminal punishment);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;