If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) called Goi-gu, Young-gu, Young-si C’s seat around 20:00, and (b) heard from the operator E of the said business to the effect that delivery is impossible due to the lack of delivery personnel; and (c) heard from the said operator of the business to the effect that the delivery is impossible due to the lack of delivery personnel; and (d) 4,000 won at packaging discount instead of leaving the package directly at home.

“When hearing the answer that there was no package discount provision even though it was water, the time limit was raised, and the time limit was raised, and the victim F (F, 36 years old) was found to be the delivery employee who was found in the host bank, and the victim found “as soon as she was f, n.e., the telephone;

The breath’s breath was expressed as “flapsing down,” and assaulted the victim by pushing the breath with approximately 1.5 meters of flapsing in a cooling house, pressing the breath from the kitchen to the hole.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Part concerning the statement of the victim F in the police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement protocol with respect to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;