When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[Criminal Records] On August 18, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor of 4 years and 6,000,000 won for the charge of forging private documents at the Jung-gu District Court on August 18, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 26th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 6, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document and the instant investigation document at “C” mobile phone sales stores operated by the Defendant located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and without D’s consent, the Defendant forged a written consent to collect, use, provide, and handle personal information, location information, and information, and received marketing information,” and forged a written consent to use the document in each customer information column of the “written consent to use a short term installment transaction contract” and “written application to subscribe to the contract system” and “written consent to use a discount system,” which are private documents related to the rights and obligations, and entered the D’s personal information into the written consent to use, provide, and handle personal information, personal information, location information, and credit information, and the written consent to receive marketing information, written consent to use, and written consent to purchase, and written consent to purchase, and written consent to purchase, and written consent to purchase, and the written consent to purchase, and the written consent to subscribe to the agreement to use, as seen above, and made it known to the Plaintiff by using the forged electronic device.

2. The defrauded committed the act as if D had normally subscribed to mobile communications services by stealing the names of D at the time, time, and place mentioned in paragraph 1, and on the same day, he/she acquired one gallon (2 mobile phone) from an employee of the Scom Telecom Co., Ltd., which is equivalent to the market value of KRW 1,089,000 from his/her own name and acquired it by deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application for the change of short term / USIM, personal information, and other consent, and application for subscription to a contract for installment transactions at short term and a contract discount system;

1. Previous conviction: A written reply to inquiries, such as criminal history;