However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

B The business owner operating a game room without a mutual name on the first floor of Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and D is a person who, as the head of the Baby and the defendant E, reports a network in preparation for crackdowns on investigation agencies outside the game room and provides guidance to customers who find out such place as a game room; F is a person who, in charge of filling and exchanging game cards; and the filling and exchanging of coffee cards for customers; and the client, and the defendant, by informing customers of the business of the game room and attracting customers to the game room.

In collusion with the above B, D, and F, from December 5, 2014 to December 19:25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with the said games, “sea-to-sea-to-sea-to-land” game products not classified by the Game Management Committee in the said game site; (b) in a case where customers who installed 38 game instruments with a card slip to be attached with 38 units are paid cash in the calculation unit, if the customers who found the game machine with 10,000 won and paid cash in the calculation unit, the Defendant contacted the game card with the game machine with the corresponding game score of 10,000 won in cash after obtaining 10,000 won in cash from the game machine; and (c) in a manner such as fish or spats, spats, etc.

When the same forest is assigned, the remaining points are accumulated after deducting 10% of the fee per point obtained according to the type of the forest and the result of the game for customers, and the card with which the game score is accumulated was exchanged in cash at the calculation unit.

As a result, the defendant, in collusion with the above B, used game products that did not receive rating classification, used them to perform speculative acts, and exchanged the results obtained as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect with regard to some of the F;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. J, K, I, L, G,.