However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 24, 2016, at around 23:30 on August 24, 2016, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as the Defendant’s house located in Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-si B, with the influence of drinking noise, and the Defendant’s house. The neighbor reported it to 112 that he could not dump so that he could not sleep.

위 신고를 받고 출동한 경남창원중부경찰서 파출소 소속 경위 C, 같은 소속 순경 D이 피고인을 제지하며 귀가하도록 안내하였음에도, 피고인은 욕설을 하면서 화분 2개를 위 C을 향해 집어 던지고, 입으로 위 C의 오른팔을 물어뜯고, 발로 위 D의 오른쪽 허벅지 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (i.e., the fact that there is no previous conviction for the preceding 20 years, reflects the fact that the person suffers from mental illness, such as alcohol addiction and depression, and is receiving hospitalized treatment);