A. In fact, the Defendant was guilty of all the facts charged of this case, even though he was flabed with the victim by plucking and plucking the victim's body and plucking and plucking down the victim's deflab, and did not inflict an injury on the victim. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts.

B. The sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The credibility of a witness’s statement, including the victim’s victim’s statement as to the assertion of fact, is not readily denied solely on the ground that the witness’s statement is consistent and consistent with the facts charged objectively, unless there exists any separate evidence to deem credibility difficult from an objective perspective. In the major part of the witness’s statement, there is little consistency in the witness’s statement on other minor matters, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2007Do10728, Mar. 14, 2008; 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). The court below duly adopted and examined the evidence in light of the following circumstances, namely, ① the victim’s statement was made at the investigative agency and court of the court below that “the victim was removed from the victim’s contact with the victim’s hand, and the victim was satisfying and satisfying the victim’s loss at the victim’s left hand.”