2. It is recognized that the Defendant committed all crimes for the first time in the trial, and that the Defendant appears to have committed the remaining crimes economically difficult.

However, prior to the instant case, the Defendant had a criminal record of having been sentenced two times as a suspended sentence and one sentenced one time to a single sentence under the same law, and the instant crime was paroled during the execution of a sentence for the same kind of crime and has been committed without being aware of the existence of the period of parole. In full view of the following circumstances, the lower court did not recognize that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable, by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the crime of having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor as stated in the first head of the crime in the judgment at the same time as the crime of having been sentenced; and (b)

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.