However, the Defendants are above three years from the date of the final judgment.

1. On July 2014, Defendant A leased 627, 1039, 1524, 1616, and 422 of the officetel 627, 1039, 1524, 1616, and 422 in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and then employed Defendant B as the head of night office and placed an advertisement to suggest sexual traffic in the name of “F” on the Internet site, and employed sexual traffic women G (one person H).

Defendant

B, from July 30, 2014 to September 1, 2014, after reporting the above advertisement, informed the nameless customers who were found to receive the above advertisement to the above place, and let the above G communicate with the above customers, and then received 1.30,000 won from the above customers, and paid 90,000 won among them to the above women of sexual traffic.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. On August 2014, Defendant B leased No. 1530 of Da Officetel 1530 in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and placed an advertisement for suggesting sexual traffic in the name of “J” on the Internet site, and employed sexual traffic women K, etc.

On August 25, 2014, from around 16:00 to September 16:00, 2014, the Defendant reported the above advertisement to the above location and provided guidance to the above location to the nameless customers, and let the above K communicate with the above customers, and received 1.30,000 won from the above customers, and paid 90,000 won among them to the above women of sexual traffic.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant A;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the police officers against the Defendants, K, and G

1. Each written statement of L and M;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Sovereign photographs;

1. Details of each Internet advertisement;

1. Report on the results of analysis of digital evidence;

1. A written contract for officetels;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigative report (No. 65,68,70 through 72 of the list of evidence);

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the defendant A who has selected a sentence on the criminal facts;