If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who drives a vehicle B as his duties.

On November 26, 2019, the Defendant was moving to D in the direction from the chump of the eth of the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic C at the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e

At the same time, a person engaged in driving service with signal lights and crosswalks has a duty of care to prevent accidents by temporarily stopping in front of the crosswalk in order to prevent the passage of pedestrians or danger and injury.

Nevertheless, the defendant, by negligence in breach of the above duty of care, caused the victim G(50 years of age) who was walking along the crosswalk to the F apartment room from the Eves point of view, according to the walking green signal, had the victim go beyond the rear.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the upper half of the left-hand body, felball, etc., which requires approximately seven weeks of treatment, due to the above negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of statutes to the written diagnosis of victims;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is limited to the negligence of the defendant and the degree of injury of the victim, the amount of fine for the summary order shall be reduced somewhat by taking into account the fact that the defendant reflects the crime, economic circumstances, criminal record relation, etc.