However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From February 26, 2014 to February 27, 2014, the Defendant operated a similar store with the trade name “D” on the third floor of the building located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around February 26, 2014, and employed sexual traffic women, such as E and F, on the condition that 20,000 won or 30,000 won are paid out of the price received from customers with five rooms with small and large size of about 30 square meters installed with CCTV and control expenses, and had the said F take advantage of the sexual organ of customers under his/her name, who was in his/her possession of the said store.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an act of arranging sexual traffic through the above method during the above period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of E, F and G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment, comprehensively, with respect to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, etc. are against the defendant. The business period and profit size of the defendant in this case, the age, character and conduct, criminal records, environment of the defendant, motive and circumstances of the crime, result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be taken into consideration equally to determine the punishment as ordered.