beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.25 2018고정202

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”).

On March 22, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 23:00, and proceeded along the five-lane road in front of the Chungcheong church located along the intersection of Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, along the two-lanes from the luminous intersection to the intersection of the parallel, and temporarily stopped to the signal atmosphere, and made a left-hand turn.

At the time, the vehicle is at night and at the same time, and in such cases, the driver of the vehicle is obliged to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle, the driver of the vehicle is prohibited from driving the vehicle at such a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the road traffic conditions and the structure and performance of the vehicle, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely examining the traffic conditions at the right and right and right and right and the right and right and right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left, and received the back part of the victim C (I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am on the left part of the driver's vehicle in front of the right side of the defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the above victim’s injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of two weeks’ medical treatment due to occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the car in the above visible 9,488,611 won.

2. No owner of any motor vehicle violating the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the automobile with soflurt which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place under Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A C’s statement (the occurrence of traffic accidents);

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;