저작권법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged shall not infringe upon any author's property right or other property rights protected pursuant to this Act by means of reproduction, performance, public transmission, public transmission, exhibition, distribution, rental, or preparation of a derivative work;
Nevertheless, on March 22, 2016, the Defendant connected the file wing site (htp:/www.Ftileb long) to Adi, and distributed them by allowing a large number of unspecified persons to work on the said website without obtaining the consent of the injured party C, which is a literary work in copyright.
Accordingly, the defendant infringed the victim's property right.
2. Article 136 (1) 1 of the Copyright Act applicable to the facts charged for judgment: A judgment dismissing a public prosecution for the cancellation of a victim's complaint on May 13, 2016 after the indictment under the main sentence of Article 140 of the Copyright Act (Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act)