On June 27, 2017, at around 18:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the ground that the victim was in dispute with the victim C(30 years of age) who was the person in charge of the accommodation of the Dong fee, and the share distribution problem. On June 27, 2017, the victim was in dispute with the victim, and the victim was in conflict with the victim on the floor of hand, and the victim was in conflict with the victim's face due to the victim's escape from the driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's seat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, F, and C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing injury photographs;

1. The grounds for sentencing (the scope of recommending punishment) of Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts are [the scope of recommending punishment] and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act [the grounds for sentencing] [the grounds for special mitigation] of punishment (the person subject to special mitigation from February to one year] in the mitigation area (the decision of sentence] of imprisonment in February]. The crime of this case in February is the crime of this case committed by the defendant by assaulting the victim by the person subject to confinement in prison, and the nature of the crime is poor, and the degree of injury suffered by the victim is not easy, so it is inevitable to sentence the

However, the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects, the defendant did not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim, and the defendant also was assaulted by the victim, such as walking bucks from the damaged person in the course of the ditch of this case, and the defendant's age, sexual conduct, career, environment, circumstances and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the remaining sentencing conditions specified in the records and theory of this case shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors.