A, B, and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

However, Defendant C.

Defendant

A and B are those who have worked as an insurance designer, and the defendants B are children of the defendant A, the defendant C and the defendant D.

The Defendants received a fixed amount of insurance money by changing the type of disease, and repeatedly hospitalized for a long time, even though the type of disease is appropriate for the outpatient treatment, the Defendants received a fixed amount of insurance money for a specific insurance accident among insurance products, using the fact that there is no de facto restriction on double subscription by insurance companies.

1. From March 6, 1998 to September 27, 2013, Defendant A purchased a total of KRW 15 to seven insurance companies, such as the Victim principal life insurance company, and KRW 593,400 monthly payment, and was hospitalized in the same disease by the same disease, when 180 days have passed since the discharge, insurance money was paid up to 120 days even if the same disease was re-hospitalizes the same disease, and when 180 days have passed since the discharge, insurance money was paid up to 120 days after the discharge, and when other diseases are hospitalized after discharge, insurance money was paid up to 88,000 won by using the insurance terms and conditions that the insurance money would be paid by the 120th day of the second day without any blank period, and additionally, the sum of the insurance money that can be paid by 31 days or more if the person is hospitalized in a specific disease, such as adult disease, was set up to KRW 7,00,000,00 for the number of days of hospitalization.

Since May 7, 2002, from around June 12, 2002 to around June 12, 2002, the Defendant was hospitalized in G hospital located in Busan FF under the name of 37 days from the diversity damage diagnosis of the diversity disorder. However, in fact, the substance of the treatment received at the above G hospital was merely a pain treatment, so there was no need for hospitalized treatment, and the Defendant was hospitalized in the form of formality, such as neglecting the disease to the hospital for a long time and leaving the hospital without permission.

Nevertheless, the defendant on June 2002.