except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 27, 2019, at around 11:29, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as “C” in front of the Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon; (b) 112 reporting that young people was used on the street; (c) the circumstances E belonging to the Daejeon Dong Police Station D District of Daejeon Police Station; (d) the police officer attempted to cause and cause the Defendant; and (d) the above E’s hyp f, “Wing f. f. f. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 times the chest part of the above E’s chest part . . 5 times the f. . . . . . . the said F was f. f. at the same time, and the said young people were f. , thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the 11

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the service log and the 112 Reporting List;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. It is necessary to strictly punish a suspended sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act as hindering a public official from performing his/her duties on the justifiable grounds of sentencing.

However, in consideration of the fact that the defendant has no same criminal power and is divided, the punishment as the order shall be determined.