When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

In 2003, the Defendant was unable to receive the sexual intercourse for an international marriage business, and the Defendant was obligated to pay approximately KRW 20 million,00,000,000 to a credit card company for obligations such as cash service and card loan, and KRW 10,000,000,000 to a loan company such as mountain money, etc., and the Defendant was obliged to pay the interest on the debt borrowed from a bank as a house-backed security even if there is no special source of revenue, it is difficult to repay the interest even if it was borrowed money without notifying the victim C of the above circumstances. However, as if it was possible to repay the money to the victim within one month without notifying the victim of the above circumstances, the Defendant knew the victim of the money to use it for the Defendant’s existing debt and interest repayment, living expenses, etc.

1. On September 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “E” restaurant operated by the victim in Busan-gu, Busan-do, that “it is necessary to use USD 2 for the victim to go to Vietnam due to the addition of two male men who will be married to Vietnam by themselves. If five million won is lent, the Defendant would receive the marriage sex payment and make payment between early.”

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 4.8 million won as the borrowed money from the victim.

2. On December 12, 2012, if the Defendant borrowed money in the same manner as Vietnam’s expenses are required at the same place, he/she would be repaid up to January 2, 2013, and deceiving the victim to do so, and he/she received 4.8 million won from the victim as the borrowed money.

3. On or around December 27, 2012, the Defendant: (a) lent funds that need Vietnam’s expenses in the same manner at the same place; (b) deceiving the victim to repay up to January 16, 2013; and (c) received KRW 9.8 million from the victim as the borrowed money.

4. On April 16, 2013, the Defendant, at the same place, has the victim’s “in no way to prevent the cards,” without cash.