A. Defendant B’s business of manufacturing BH (stilt-up H Bem, assembly, and shot board in the form of H) and steel structure within the 2 plant of Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) located in Gyeong-gun and supplying the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co.”).

B. The Plaintiff (EEs and Sri Lanka) entered the Republic of Korea as a visa on February 4, 2014 (Employment Permit System) and was employed by Defendant B for the manufacture of other metal-processed products and parts from December 8, 2016.

On January 6, 2017, the Plaintiff was engaged in the business of moving BH to the next stage work space at the production 3 team work site within the Defendant Company No. 2 factory (hereinafter “instant work”).

In order to carry out the instant work, the Plaintiff: (a) removed BH from the cler; (b) dismantled a Haker (a sn beam fixed device in the shape of a house, and equipment used to clere BH) that clert the clert; (c) removed BH from the clert; and (d) performed the work of raising clers using the clert adjustment device; (b) caused BH’s clert (Flge, BH’s H’s h h h h h h h h h h h, thereby facing the Plaintiff’s bridge part (hereinafter “instant accident”).

The plaintiff suffered injuries due to the accident of this case, such as the structural frame of the right lavis, the upper left lavis, the upper left lavis, the left-hand lavis, the left-hand lavis, the left-hand lavis, the lavis beer beer, the lavis beer, the lavis beer, and the lavise was cut down below the lavis.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, and 17 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B

A. The facts acknowledged in paragraph (1) above, each evidence, evidence Nos. 10 and 11, and evidence No. 2, can be considered together with the purport of the entire pleadings.