A. On June 24, 2004, the Plaintiff fell from 16m high working level of 16m Mson’s 27ms in the Kson’s manufacturing site No. 3 and 4 table, the Plaintiff obtained approval of the instant medical care from 200 to 16m high-level injury (hereinafter “the instant medical care”) due to an accident falling from the top of 16m high working level.

B. On October 23, 2006, the Defendant rendered a disposition to adjust the Plaintiff’s disability grade 1 [1] (Article 2 subparag. 5 (Article 2 subparag. 5 (Article 2 subparag. 5) of the disability grade (Article 8 subparag. 2) of the Mental and Mental Function; 2) of the discharged disability grade No. 8] (Article 8 subparag. 2 of the discharged disability grade).

C. On November 8, 2013, the Defendant re-determineds the Plaintiff’s disability grade No. 2 grade 5 on the ground that the result of the re-examination by the Improper Demand and Supply Investigation Board on November 8, 2013 and the result of the advisory doctor’s meeting on October 2, 2013, the Plaintiff could normally operate and lead a daily life, and at the time of cure, the determination of the disability grade No. 2 grade No. 5 on the ground that there is an obvious defect due to the exaggeration of the state of injury, and re-determinations the Plaintiff’s disability grade No. 9 grade No. 7 [15 of the disability grade No. 9 (a person whose work remains considerably limited to a considerable degree of considerable impediment to the function or mental function of the nursing system)]. (hereinafter “re-determination disposition of this case”).

In addition, the defendant has already paid to the plaintiff on November 11, 2013.