However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 23, 2015, from around 19:30 to around 21:00, the Defendant: (a) taken a video image of 21 seconds from the victim’s ambling in front of the victim’s name, who was a woman suffering from the bend of the victim’s influence, using a white string, beer, beer colored, and smartphone (G protocol 2) with the victim’s amblock and bridge function, which may cause sexual humiliation, against the victim’s will.

2. The Defendant, at the time and at the place specified in paragraph 1, taken a video image of 10 seconds against the victim’s will, using smartphone (G protocol 2) with the victim’s sexual humiliation function, which could cause a sense of sexual shame, using the victim’s ambl and bridge function.

3. The Defendant, at the time and at the place specified in paragraph 1, taken a video image of one minute 5 seconds against the victim’s will, using smartphone (G protocol 2) with the victim’s scam and bridge function, which could cause sexual humiliation, by using the victim’s scam and bridge function behind the victim’s scam and bridge, which was scambling scam and white tension.

4. The Defendant, at the time and at the place specified in paragraph 1, taken visual images of eight seconds against the victim’s will, using smartphone (G protocol 2) with the victim’s straw and bridge function that could cause a sense of sexual shame by using the victim’s tampts and bridge function behind the victim’s name, who suffered scambruts and white reflects.

5. The Defendant taken screen pictures of 34 seconds against the victim’s will, using smartphone (G protocol 2) with the victim’s lamera function, which was behind the victim D (name, fluor, fluor, 27 years old) who suffered lucing lucing lucing lucings, color lucings, and white lucings, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, and using smartphone (G protocol 2).

(i) the evidence;