A. misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles are not found to have been engaged in the drinking house operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant drinking house”) from the beginning with the beginning, but it was combined with the foregoing drinking house without the employee’s guidance on the back of the drinking house where an adult person was drinking alcohol at the main place of this case.

Therefore, the Defendant could not have predicted that D, a juvenile, would be incompetence in the adult’s drinking place, and thereafter, D did not have been aware that D was a juvenile and did not have been incompetence. Thus, the Defendant had a criminal intent to sell alcoholic beverages to juveniles.

subsection (b) of this section.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (an amount of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the misapprehension of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. The following facts are acknowledged in full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below.

① On December 27, 2014, D was investigated by the police on December 27, 2014, and 09: 04:00 on December 27, 2014, D 6, including the f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's f's d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d' d'.